Thanks for the info Phil! IIRC for the Rage, the paletted texture option is emulation and isn’t real paletted texturing. I’m very curious to see if one would work on a PC. Users browsing this forum: Performance In 16 bit the card is behind the competition:
|Date Added:||23 December 2004|
|File Size:||27.44 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Its not like components found in trash after 20 years in rain dont still work flawlessly.
Not worse, not better. Those cakes make you sick I tell Views Read Edit View history. In the beginning the drivers were really bad typical for ATi at this time.
ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra
Rage was a confusing branding mess. The card does perform exactly like expected.
Neat trick, you can display the video signal as desktop wallpaper. Don’t eat stuff off a 15 year old never cleaned cpu cooler.
ATI Technologies ATI RAGE 128 PRO GL (100416147) 64MB AGP 4x/8x Graphics adapter
Your benchmarks actually unveiled nothing unexpected. This, in addition to its early lack of OpenGL support, hurt sales for what was touted to be a solid gaming solution.
I know you said it was a little weak in bit. You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this 182.
VOGONS • View topic – ATI Rage Pro vs Ultra?
Windows 95 and Mac OS were not supported. So what clocks did your Rage Pro had? The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don’t know. Note that these are done on a fast P4 running at 3 GHz, all part of a larger Windows 98 benchmarking project I’m working on: Rags browsing this forum: This late chip was very similar to the Rage II and supported the same application coding.
This site hosts no abandonware.
And yes, drivers from this CD wasn’t installing by default. It ran good and 4xk guess ok enough on MacOS How did the bit image quality compare to the TNT2 and Voodoo3? This is the starting point of my love to ATi programmers It boots fine on the Pro but its just a bit dodgy – Alt-Ctrl-Del doesn’t work Conclusion – Had no driver issues – V-Sync controls built into driver – Some advanced options in driver – Slow in 16 bit compared to competition – Great in 32 bit compared to competition – 16 bit image quality looks a bit rough – Great multimedia features – Careful with OEM cards – Excellent VGA image quality.
Good point about the difficulties on getting the “proper” cards.
ATI Rage PRO Ultra Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database
Almost every version of Rage was used in mobile applications, but there were also some special versions of these chips which were optimized for this. Current technologies and software.
I used the latest drivers from the AMD website and didn’t run into any issues, but I only tested a handful of games and benchmarks, so keep that in mind: But in 32 bit it is very competitive and goes head to head with the TNT2 range of cards: Archived copy as title Pages using deprecated image syntax Commons category link is locally defined. The card also worked great in a Slot 1 motherboard with Intel BX chipset.
Use S-Video for best quality: They were ATI’s first graphics solutions to carry the Mobility moniker.